[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsorship Funding of the LDP
On 24 Oct, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> If I were directing the LDP, though, I'd move even closer together. I
> would have the mandate focus enclusively on Linux education. It would
> be "a project to document Linux" and say nothing about ownership. LDP
> would be a conduit where any document relating to Linux could be
> found, whether free, OPL or commercial. The LDP would be as much a
> "metadocument" as an actual repository.
Gary, there is absolutely nothing at all stopping you doing that right
now. Just build a meta-project that includes the LDP.
To want to put the LDP at the top of such a tree I think misses the
fundamental reason that the LDP was created and exists. The software is
free, so should the documentation be.
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com