[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative sgmltools?
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 10:28:07PM +0100, Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
> sgml-tools (v1) was declared obsolete about 18 months ago in favor of
> sgmltools (v2) by the maintainers (see http://www.sgmltools.org/). The
> tools can work beside one another if you need both. But I don't write in
> linuxdoc as it is much too limited for any serious documentation.
Taketoshi Sano has volunteered to fix any "real bugs" in the Debian
Package of sgml-tools (v1). He also mentioned his "motivation to
maintain this package :)". So it is sort of being maintained. In
contrast the sgmltools (v2) site says "The SGML tools project has been
suspended". Thus it's not at all clear that sgml-tools (v1) is
obsolete, especially since LDP is still requiring Linuxdoc which needs
it and also since the sgmltools (v2) project is officially suspended.
> > > However sgmltools (v2) does not work with Linuxdoc but requires DocBook
> > > SGML sources.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org