[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: alternative sgmltools?
On Dec 22, 2:45pm, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> Subject: Re: alternative sgmltools?
> Is there a reason for this? Having one tool that supports both LD
> and DB will be quite helpful.
> Hugo.van.der.Kooij@caiw.nl wrote:
> > However sgmltools (v2) does not work with Linuxdoc but requires
> > DocBook SGML sources.
> > Hugo.
This does not make sense to me, as the tools should be DTD independent.
I've got v2, and it looks as though a linuxdoc DTD and stylesheet(s)
were not included with the package.
These components *should* be all that is necessary to make the tools
work with linuxdoc-DTD-based SGML source file(s).
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org