[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RAID HOWTOs
Greg Ferguson wrote:
> On Jan 20, 9:06am, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> > Subject: Re: RAID HOWTOs
> > ...
> > This would also help people who want to help out
> > with the LDP by taking up maintence of HOWTOs that aren't being
> > maintained.
> Would it help if I put together a list of those HOWTO's that haven't
> been modified in "X" amount of time, with pointers to the docs
I've noticed that a lot of the HOWTOs use a timespan of six months in
"dating" the document. I.E. if this document is older than six months,
then check URL for more information. Does this sound like a reasonable
timespan for the LDP to adopt? I realize that some documents will last
much longer, and some won't last anywhere near that long, but on
> We would then have to determine if the doc itself is still relevent,
> in a given context.
This should just be a matter of having someone familiar with the subject
read over it.
> This is something that could be done quickly. Perhaps the
> page containing this info would have a "mailto:" pointer
> that would come back to this list? - "If you are interested in
> working on/modifying/etc this document click...".
Sounds good to me.
> just a thought; lmk.
> Greg Ferguson - s/w engr / mtlhd | firstname.lastname@example.org
> SGI Tech Pubs - http://techpubs.sgi.com | 410-785-2334
> Linux Doc Project - http://www.linuxdoc.org |
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org