[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Preamble: Re: mini-HOWTO
> Warning, this email may provoke flames.
> Alessandro Rubini wrote:
Yes, the subject matter is hot, and my words are still hotter.
So I ask you read this message before replying to my comments.
What has been quoted on this list was posted to ldp-submit, and not to
ldp-discuss for a specific reason: the expressed opinions are harsh
enough to deserve some digesting before going to ldp-discuss.
This does not mean I only raise my voice in small groups, it means I'd
prefer to have some feedback from other reviewers before turning on
the flamefest. I've always been quite liberal in what I say in
ldp-submit, in order to solicite other opinions and stand corrected
quickly if I'm mistaking the whole issue.
And I definitely don't want to be harsh to any specific author. The
problem goes beyond the individual document that made me post, and I
think each author has some sound reason to post documents, even if
they duplicate existing ones. The human side of the LDP is *very*
important, and each author deserves respect and politeness, especially
because email conveys too small information to allow any kind of
So what I did is raising what I see as a general problem, I willingly
did it with harsh words because the audience was small and I wanted to
raise comments, and did use one specific author as an example to
instantiate the issue.
Obviously this is only a disclaimer about the tone and attitude, while
I confirm the content of my message. And I'm not even saying that Greg
did a bad job in posting to ldp-discuss, it had to be done, sooner or
later, it's only me who wasn't ready for that.
Also, my opinions are only my own, the FSF is not involved.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org