[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
David Lawyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 08:33:59PM -0800, Tom Fawcett wrote:
> > The LDP has taken as long as 6 months (!) to update documents on
> > linuxdoc.org, but lately it's been about a week or two. Until they get
> > CVS or automated submission scripts I believe that's about as fast as
> > it's going to get.
> Not so. The longest it's been was almost 2 months and only a few
> authors (including me) suffered this long of a delay.
I don't know how you can make an absolute statement about other people's
experiences. It's taken longer than that for me. This is one of my sore
points with the LDP. I disliked getting email questions and bug reports
about obsolete documentation that had been fixed and submitted months
earlier -- but which the LDP hadn't gotten around to updating on their site.
On that point, what's the story on getting a CVS tree?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org