[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Requiring use of DocBook; LinuxDoc
Jeff Waugh wrote:
> * Not removing from DocBook, removing from example. Read into it a little
> harder, please, without issuing a flame.
I think you have a low ignition temperature.
> * DocBook is not 'obscure', it's quite straightforward.
There seem to be a lot of people who'd rather use LinuxDoc.
Their posts seem to describe DocBook as anything but
"straightforward." Certainly, there's a subset of folks that
think DocBook is too big for their computers.
> * Do you think DB:TDG is bad resource?
No, I think it's a reference, hardly a tutorial.
> * As a documentation writer, you need only care about your DocBook. DSSSL is
I need feedback. The ultimate objective is putting out
documentation that people can read, is it not? If I don't
know what effect the tags will have on the final product,
I'm running open-loop.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org