[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 02:51:04PM -0400, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
> Many people, primarily young people ;), have lobbied for merging these
> heirarchies, and all have been defeated by the very valid requirements
> of system administrators on large systems. For your personal Linux
> box, you may do what you like, but the executive summary of all of this
> is that the current schemes exist for good reasons and any new scheme
> (as with any area of life) must consider the _whole_ ecology.
I still use /usr/dangerous :-) where I install the software I compile,
while I prefer /opt/ for precompiled or huge compiled packages
But your comment is very adequate, I suggest we use :
for the packaged documentation, while :
would be used for the HOWTO packages (deb, rpm...) soon available from
DocBrowser could easilly parse both directories, the later superceding
the former, to present the users a good interface to documentation.
man page, info files and "foreign" doc in /usr/doc could be handled
either by symlinks or by coding a search routine in the standard paths.
Guylhem P. Aznar http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ----- Benjamin Franklin
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org