[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boilerplate License Revision Proposal
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:43:04AM -0700, David Lawyer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 07:26:47PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > > I will not do so. I think the Open Publication is a good license. I think
> > > that option B (but not A) is an excellent option for corporations and
> > > individuals alike.
> Note that the LDP Manifesto permits the use of option A (but
> discourages it since option A prohibits modification). The LDP
> Manifesto does not allow the use of option B that Poet says is "an
> excellent option". I think that option B is a poor option.
Yup. It would prevent reusage.
> I think it's a good thing to restrain people from making money in some
> cases. For example, if they were making excessive profits from it.
As long as the work is released under the GFDL, they can not "block"
any improvement or concurrency.
> However, this is not the case for LDP documents since the books
> containing them seem to be low in price.
> If authors sold the rights for commercial reprint, then the price for
> the books would likely be higher even though profits would still be
> made. There are two reasons for higher prices:
> 1. The cost of paying the author
> 2. The monopoly right to commercially print the document and prohibit
> anyone else from doing so (prohibit competition).
And this would be *bad*.
> That's why I support our current policy of rejecting option B, etc.
Before taking any decision; I would like more feedback on that point;
Joshua did his best to get us feedback from kuro5hin.org.
What do other other think about optionB ?
I think we should allow OPL, but without the options
Guylhem P. Aznar http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ----- Benjamin Franklin
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com