[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Current summit

On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 08:40:16AM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> This would be a "suggested" license correct? Not a Required license?

You're right :

1. we would provide a set of requirements that are currenly spread
between the manifesto and the former LDPL ; any license compatible with
the requirements would be allowed (for ex OPL-a-b, GFDL and MPL - that
would save us trouble)

2. we would just explain why we recommand either license if we do
recommand it (each license can have its advocate and its section).

Guylhem P. Aznar                               http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu                    http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -----  Benjamin Franklin

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org