[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ldp-discuss list problems
Alright before everyone gets stinky. There appears to be a problem with
one of our secondaries. It is causes problems with certain networks. It
has been reported and is being delt with.
Everybody just chill.
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Dan York wrote:
>Well, I just *tried* to send to "firstname.lastname@example.org", but once again
>the list seems to be missing-in-action. And the reason we are moving
>to these new lists is what?
>If I could get the message below out, I would have!
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: failure notice
>Date: 6 Dec 2000 16:09:05 -0000
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at e-smith.net.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>22.214.171.124 does not like recipient.
>Remote host said: 550 <email@example.com>... Relaying denied
>Giving up on 126.96.36.199.
>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>Received: (qmail 24276 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2000 16:08:34 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO e-smith.com) (192.168.16.20)
> by 192.168.14.2 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2000 16:08:34 -0000
>Received: (qmail 6766 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2000 16:08:34 -0000
>Received: from unknown (HELO e-smith.com) (192.168.16.198)
> by 192.168.16.20 with SMTP; 6 Dec 2000 16:08:34 -0000
>Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 11:08:34 -0500
>From: Dan York <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Organization: e-smith, inc.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686)
>Subject: The purpose of this mailing list - discussion of *LDP*, not general
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Alfredo, lzx and Jose,
>Welcome to the LDP mailing lists and we would certainly appreciate your
>involvement and assistance in our work documenting Linux. However,
>I'm afraid you probably won't find people on the list answering the
>questions you have just posted, since this list is really for
>discussion about *LDP* issues and NOT about general Linux questions.
>You'll find this more clearly stated along with some resources at:
>I would especially encourage you to seek out a local Linux User
>Group (LUG). If there isn't one right around you, most LUGs have
>mailing lists which are open to everyone to join in. In those
>mailing lists, you will find a crowd of people who can answer
>just the type of questions you are asking. On the page I mention
>above it points to one source of info about LUGs:
>You may also find the following sites useful (there is no central
>listing of all LUGs, so some lists may have entries that others
>I wish we had the time to answer questions like you have asked,
>but we simply do not.
>Thank you - and if you are interested in helping us with
>documentation, we would certainly welcome your participation.
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org